Imagine a platform for compliance costs $12,000 per year. Does that sound expensive?
The replacement it makes will determine the answer.
If you invest $12,000 to cut down on hundreds of hours collecting evidence in an extremely complex technology environment, it could be money well invested. The math would be different when a team of seven individuals could gather the same evidence in just one or two minutes per month.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Start by asking which one has the greatest features. Ask your company how these tools can help you save time and money.
Automation is an economic break-even Factor
It’s not intrinsically good or evil. Scale affects its value. Imagine a growing technology company with hundreds of employees, numerous cloud environments, many applications, and frequent access modifications. The strain of manually gathering evidence continuously could become very excessive. Integrations that automately monitor systems and collect evidence may quickly justify their cost.
Now think about a 10-person company making preparations for its first SOC 2. Imagine a startup having 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2.
Vanta pricing is based on this distinction. The capabilities of a modern platform are amazing, however they are only useful in the event that an organization requires them.
Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands
Vanta vs Drata is a comparison that can easily become a feature by feature exercise. It is crucial to evaluate the services, features as well as the quotes and contracts of both platforms. Both are established platform for compliance, which focuses on integrations and automation.
You’ll need to make a decision on something else first. Do you want to use a compliance platform that integrates? Certain businesses would prefer continuous monitoring as well as automated evidence collection and automated evidence gathering. Some businesses prefer to create evidence on their own, particularly in cases of low workload.
Vanta Competitors Don’t All Use the Same Model
Many Vanta competitors are also in a similar category that emphasizes automation. There are also platforms with a simpler design which focus more on system organization and connectivity.
CertAssist belongs to the latter category. The product was created by compliance consultants as well as internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls within a single workspace. It allows for the editing of policies and evidence guidance, and permits auditors to look over evidence through restricted access.
It does not, in fact, connect to operating systems, nor create infrastructure agents. Customers can upload their own evidence if they’ve chosen.
Consideration should be given to the system’s access.
It is obvious that removing integrations can be a disadvantage. Someone has to gather evidence manually.
This removes the requirement to integrate and the implementation of compliance is not dependent upon any connection to the operating environment.
The design and architecture of one is not superior to the other. It is essential to consider what choices make sense for your business.
CertAssist aims at teams that have between five and 200 employees and provides pricing information rather than having to have an in-person sales meeting. The advertised price of launch for CertAssist is $225 per monthly, as opposed to the usual $375.
Let Complexity Find Its Place
The requirements for a start-up with 10 employees are not necessarily identical to those of an organization with 100 or 500 workers.
A simple platform could make sense if compliance remains easy. As the amount of systems, employees frameworks, and evidence requirements increase, the economy could eventually favor greater automation. Let complexity take its place when purchasing compliance technology.
Paying for fifty integrations just because they look good in a table of comparisons isn’t worth the cost. Spend money on them if manually performing the task they replace is more costly.